Skip to main content


With the G20 making noises about taxing the rich, there's quite a bit of commentary suggesting the tide may be changing on how we treat the super-rich... but at the same time we also know that a number of low tax countries have been 'putting out their wares' to attract those fleeing such (purported) developments....

will anything really change?

the cynic in me thinks any changes will be marginal & incremental.

The rich remain the most dangerous minority!

#politics
theguardian.com/news/article/2…

in reply to Emeritus Prof Christopher May

There's plenty of nations out there willing to provide a haven for the super-wealthy, either willingly, paid for or coerced through other means. Removing the malign influence and power they hold is a difficult proposition but there's always the guillotine method when rules and legislation aren't enough.
in reply to Emeritus Prof Christopher May

I’m inexpert so this is just a kinda gut response.

But I assume the revenues we’d get from taxing the super-rich would be significantly less than what we’d get from increasing corporation taxes and closing tax loopholes?

If so, I suspect that’s why the tide may be turning on this.

in reply to uoou

@uoou

yes, that's an interesting point - much depends on the efficacy of capturing taxes from the super-rich & the rates levied - but in the end on a global level, you'd be right I'm sure.... that said there is also work undergoing at OECD & UN to move to a tighter global corporate tax regime...

@uoou
in reply to Emeritus Prof Christopher May

If only the toxic billionaires had been content loafing around on their super yachts and getting STDs / fat we’d have been content to ignore them perhaps. But buying up politicians and seeking to topple democracies mean that maybe it’s time they received a sharp reminder of who was tolerating their morbid acquisitive urges.
in reply to Christine Burns MBE πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈπŸ“šβ§–

@christineburns wonder if we could afford winter fuel payments if was for them getting dodgy contract and disappearing back to their yachts
Pre Thatcher upper income tax rate return wouldn’t go amiss
in reply to Emeritus Prof Christopher May

@christineburns the trick is in calling their bluff. if they want to go live in a gated community in a place that's falling apart because it can't raise tax revenue they can stay here... no, i mean, they can go there.

The millionaires and billionaires that would leave, we can do without. by definition.

in reply to Emeritus Prof Christopher May

I notice folks like Musk are increasingly weighing into politicsβ€”usually the populist right. They haven't really thought it through. If the people on the centre-left are under attack from the billionaire elite, what incentive is there for them to go easy on them? I'm looking forward to Stramer/Harris era where these techbros get what's coming their way. It's long overdue...
in reply to Emeritus Prof Christopher May

Pretty sure it's one change we won't see in the UK, it's much easier to target pensioners, children and the sick.
⇧