Skip to main content


I am starting a new little service - predominantly on LinkedIn as it's full of rail bullshit - but cross posted here

My "Bullshit Meter"

A quick reaction to a rail story, assessing whether it will happen or not

Here are a few examples...

Want me to assess a story? Send it over!

in reply to Jon Worth

love this! Though this is factcheckin Jon that’s illegal in the US now 😂😂😂
in reply to Jon Worth

I have my own opinion based on it being the fifth proposal in twenty years from the same people however, this www.theguardian.com/business/202...

From dream to reality: Go-op, ...

in reply to Al

@al--s.bsky.social Ah I will stay away from UK rail stories though, except the channel tunnel
@Al
in reply to Jon Worth

For St-Michel-Valloire - Modane I can find an article mentioning a reopening in the "second half of March", announced by SNCF Réseau on 3rd December 2024. At the moment there is no timetable data around to confirm when direct TGV and Frecce between Paris and Milano will return.

torinotoday.it/attualita/treno…

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to Jon Worth

Connections from Vienna to Murtal (Leoben, Knittelfeld, Judenburg, Unzmarkt, ...) will not be more than 10min slower after the opening of Koralmbahn in December of 2025. (RJ from Vienna to Klagenfurt, now running through Murtal will then go via Graz.)

Realistic?

in reply to Jon Worth

@orangerkater @vorortanleiter No problem. Hope this works out. I heared many different and changing assertions from ÖBB, the past Styrian government and the outgoing Austrian government over the past two years.
in reply to Jon Worth

👍 Maybe add the name of your website for those who don't know you in case those photos appear elsewhere?🤔
in reply to Jon Worth

I do hope that you are the one that made up the Dubai claim - no-one can really be this ... unrealistic, or?
in reply to Knud Jahnke

@Knud Jahnke @Jon Worth I’m just sad that the Sud Express rumour absolutely isn’t happening any time soon.

I’d much rather not give my money to O’Leary

Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source
Jon Worth
@af Yep, will do that one.
in reply to Jon Worth

"which couldm ean going into production this year" for 400km/h high speed trains: railtech.com/all/2025/01/03/40…
in reply to Jon Worth

Is the Dubai tunnel meant to be made of transparent glass so that passengers can see fish swimming past?
in reply to Jon Worth

Were it not for geopolitics, they could do it, going under the Gulf of Oman and then overland through Iran and Pakistan
in reply to Jon Worth

That's a pretty bold claim about the Gorizia-Nova Gorica connection. I mean, sure, they are literally the Italian half and the Slovenian half of the SAME CITY, but knowing the absolutely dismal state of Slovenian railways, I can see some way in which they can still screw it up.
in reply to eribosot

@eribosot No. 1) Slovenian railways have improved a lot in recent years, 2) it's capital of culture and just 3km to run, and 3) test trains have run already.
in reply to Jon Worth

@eribosot Locals from Nova Gorica report the first train will depart Gorizia on February 8th, but they are expecting it to arrive in Nova Gorica only on February 11th. 😀
in reply to Jon Worth

Sorry for being cynical (and sarcastic). It's just that I was recently forced to spend 4+ hours traveling from Ljubljana to Venice, and 4+ hours back... on a bus. Because there doesn't seem to be any train connection from Ljubljana to the nearest big Italian city.
in reply to eribosot

@eribosot Google Maps is crap for rail. NEVER trust it. Sorry. Said out of bitter experience. Always use Deutsche Bahn's planner for European rail.
in reply to Jon Worth

*clicks Follow button* thanks for the tip! I was aware of bahn.de's status, just didn't realize GMaps was so bad...
in reply to eribosot

@eribosot It's weird. Google Maps for rail feels so.... totally under developed. It works OK in some places, not in others. In some countries the data is totally off - trains listed that don't exist.

Re. Slovenia - the main headache is the infra towards Trieste. The tracks are hellish slow due to the topography. Slovenian railways are doing the best they can, but can't change much that direction given the infra.

in reply to Jon Worth

@eribosot The best way to get from Slovenia to Trieste is indeed via Gorizia. Passing the mountains behind Trieste is just not an option. There is the very lovely Opicina tram line but I am not sure about the current operational state of that little gem of infrastructure engineering. The latest thing I know is that it was out of service.
in reply to Jon Worth

@eribosot Lackluster rail support is one of the things that really show Google Maps is "Designed in California". Meanwhile it's excellent at showing where traffic jams are 🤷‍♂️
in reply to Jon Worth

@eribosot Google Maps also terrible for transitions from one kind of public transport to another. Go from a train to bus and it will have you walking in a big circle 10 minutes to move less than 100 m to catch your connection. Add on a couple of minutes for safety and all the carefully planned public transport schedules go out the window.
in reply to Jon Worth

Quickest connection seems to be 5h31m with a switch in Trieste.
in reply to eribosot

@eribosot See openrailwaymap.org/?style=stan…

The train from Ljubljana goes Divaca - Sezana - Villa Opicina - Aurisina - Miramare - Trieste!

in reply to eribosot

@eribosot
There is openrailwaymap.org/ based on the #openstreetmap database and it is usually very good. And if there is a mistake: you are able to correct it on OSM yourself.
@jon
in reply to Jens W. Klein

@jensens but OpenRailwayMap isn’t a planning tool for rail, and doesn’t claim to be. Google Maps tries to and doesn’t manage. (FWIW I use OpenRailwayMap all the time - it’s ace) @eribosot
in reply to Jon Worth

Right. For international train routes I often use thetrainline.com
It works better than the organization specific sites like oebb.at or bahn.de, but it is not perfect too.
@eribosot
in reply to Jens W. Klein

@jensens For point to point it is OK, but if your route is semi complex it breaks quite easily. I generally always plan with DB, and then work out how to buy. @eribosot
in reply to Jens W. Klein

@jensens Disagree. DB has for two decades been an excellent planning tool. Trainline never has. @eribosot
in reply to Jon Worth

@jensens @eribosot and by DB you mean the APP or the webpage?

Asking for myself who plans to travel by train from Genoa (Italy) to Portugal

in reply to Matthias Drexel

@matthiasdrexel Spain is one of the few countries where DB doesn't work for planning - because Renfe does not share Cercanias and Rodalies data with UIC whose database DB uses for connections there (note: this is 100% Renfe's fault, not DB’s) @jensens @eribosot
in reply to Jon Worth

@jensens @eribosot so till the spanish Border (Italy and France) DB is fine, and beyond spanish border you would recommend Renfe's services, right?
Is DB also fine for Portugal (after crossing the spanish border again)?
in reply to Matthias Drexel

@matthiasdrexel @jensens @eribosot Yes, pretty much exactly that, yes. And if your connection is only on Renfe high speed trains in Spain then DB is OK. DB doesn't work if you use local trains, or use private rivals to Renfe.
in reply to eribosot

@eribosot Apologies for the late reply, I'm from Gorizia and thought I should give more insights to the situation

The cross-border trains *will* run - I've seen the test trains in Nova Gorica station (the renovation of which is almost complete and it's looking wonderful), though only 2 a day from Venezia Mestre and sat/sun only; still, it's better than nothing. Of course using buses 1/INT to connect between the two stations is still possible

Meanwhile on the other border there are currently the following trains per day:
- 2 regionals Trieste-V. Opicina-Ljubljana, currently with a timed transfer in Opicina but this is supposed to be temporary
- 1 EC Trieste-Ljubljana-Maribor-Vienna, tickets can be bought on the train, prices are affordable even for very short journeys
- 1 regional Villa Opicina-Divača-Rijeka (summer-only, no news about it restarting this year just yet)
- from this year, supposedly: 1 direct Frecciarossa Milano-Ljubljana

in reply to samuele963

@samuele963 That Frecciarossa would be a real game changer, but I don't find it in the bahn.de site. And here's a webpage promising the same thing approximately one year ago: railwaypro.com/wp/high-speed-c… Any idea what the holdup is?
in reply to eribosot

@eribosot @samuele963 They have switched the model of train they want to approve. It *might* happen in June this year.
in reply to Jon Worth

Love it thanks! Just a small nitpick: the red to green transition is difficult to realise for those (up to 9% of men in Europe) with difficulties to discern red and green. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congenit…
But it's a minor problem as the info is coded also via symbols/emojis.
This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to Jon Worth

Love it. Just needs like a box with a single color background around the bullsh*t-meter as the 💩-icon is hard to see
in reply to Jon Worth

I like it, but I'd like also to have a link to more detailed explanation with sources.
in reply to nLupo

@nlupo I will if I can. But honestly if everyone else is producing unthinking bullshit, I am not going to bother much with all the sources. Sorry.
in reply to nLupo

@nlupo (if I am factually wrong somewhere, then by all means call me out on it)
in reply to Jon Worth

(and inevitably this worked better on every network *other than* LinkedIn. Hey ho…)
in reply to Jon Worth

not surprised, the point of LinkedIn is reciprocal professional onanism, not myth busting
in reply to Jon Worth

Cross border bullshit, or European railways in general? I am genuinely curious about whether Spain will ever extend its rail network along the south coast. It's been talked about since forever, but there has been a new surge of publicity recently.

surinenglish.com/malaga/the-go…

in reply to Alan Grant

@alan In principle I’ll have a go at any rail issue, but that one is beyond me - I do not know the topography or the likely demand well enough to assess that sensibly. Sorry!
in reply to Jon Worth

Yes it's a bit specialised alright!

One thing I've noticed over the years is that the focus keeps flipping between a high speed line that would whisk tourists from Madrid or Málaga airport to Marbella on the AVE, versus a more mundane commuter line. This project seems to be more focused on the latter.

in reply to Jon Worth

@abeorch Treinreiziger has a few more details (in Dutch). Apparently, Virgin thinks that the regulator will make room for one competitor but not more which is why they are in a hurry to be that one competitor.

treinreiziger.nl/virgin-wil-sn…

in reply to Martin Hoffmann

@partim @abeorch Sceptical. You could do the main maintenance somewhere else. The extent to which Temple Mills is really the main hindrance here... I am not at all sure. Strikes me this is masking other dysfunctions.
in reply to Jon Worth

@abeorch St Pancras is an issue, though. The regulator forcing Eurostar to make space for exactly one competitor there sounds like a reasonable assumption to me.
in reply to Martin Hoffmann

@partim @abeorch Nope, St Pancras - for space for trains - is not an issue, off peak. Passenger throughput is, but is being worked on, and would apply to all.

I see this Virgin game differently. If they sign with a manufacturer *before* Evolyn then the investors in the other one get cold feet. All this Temple Mills stuff is a smokescreen for that I think.

in reply to Martin Hoffmann

@partim The article did set me thinking: Would a (presumably low-cost) Ashford-Calais Ville service make sense? What network could that integrate into? Would it be useful to inspect Calais Ville on #crosschannelrail as well?
in reply to Patrick Dersjant RCX

@patrick @partim I’ve wondered the same, although slightly further - I reckon a Stratford-Ebbsfleet-Ashford-Calais Frethun-Lille Europe low cost would be the way, with stabling and maintenance at Tourcoing where there is space. But would it be economic?
in reply to Jon Worth

@patrick You’d still have to convince the French to station border staff there, though. Not sure how easy that is going to be.
in reply to Martin Hoffmann

@partim @patrick Or pay for it. Exactly how these officials are financed is not clear to me (same for UK officials in Rotterdam and Amsterdam) - do the rail firms contribute if they want to open up these terminals?
in reply to Jon Worth

@partim @patrick At least for the Netherlands there is a convenant stipulating that Eurostar pays the costs for the border control officials and for the interior of the rooms where the border control is executed.
in reply to Jon Worth

@partim @patrick They pay for the costs the Dutch state has for the border control. The four state agreement allows every state to ask repayment for the costs involved with having foreign border force agents in their country, so those costs are probably billed to the United Kingdom that probably also has a convenant with Eurostar.

zoek.officielebekendmakingen.n…

Jon Worth reshared this.

in reply to Jon Worth

@patrick @partim agreed - it really needs a “normal “ train rather than a special Channel Tunnel train
in reply to Jon Worth

Hamburg - Copenhagen via a undersea tunnel in puttgarden by 2029?

Ref: infrainfohub.com/fehmarnbelt-u…

Bonus: if we don't get this, what are the chances of a revival of the train-on-ferry connection on that line that used to exist?