Skip to main content


This has the same vibe as those pictures of where they found the bullet holes on Spitfires returning from missions.
in reply to GLC

@glc Abraham Wald. One of the early successes of operations research.

Another success was the anti-aircraft guns on the Murmansk convoy ships: someone suggested to remove them as they hardly ever shot down a German plane. Research showed that that was not their function and that they were effective in protecting the ships.

@GLC
in reply to Martin Vermeer FCD

@martinvermeer @glc
It took me a very long time to work out that fighter pilots' "kill" scores were almost irrelevant; what actually counted was their effectiveness in disrupting the enemy aircraft's operations, not in destroying them.
This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to DeterioratedStucco

@martinvermeer @glc
The desire for individual heroes as a PR mechanism, much as the popularity of the Special Forces soldier, seems to me to be related to the mass, mechanised nature of warfare, and particularly modern warfare.
My guess is that it becomes a major part of militaries' PR efforts as a reaction to the Crimean War and the then-new photography of the apparatus and results of war, though perhaps the American Civil War photographs had similar impact.
in reply to DeterioratedStucco

@SoftwareTheron @glc It's also the 'do something' fallacy. Like police effectiveness measured by the number of stops and searches, arrests, fines, etc., rather than some metric of actually keeping the community safe. And it's disastrously ineffective, anti-effective even, at achieving its purported goal. @mekkaokereke wrote about this.

hachyderm.io/@mekkaokereke/113…