Skip to main content

British MPs want to haul Elon Musk before parliament over riots

*Musk has spent days beefing with politicians over the far-right unrest sweeping the UK. *

Elon Musk could be summoned for a grilling by British MPs over X’s role in race riots that have rocked the U.K. over the last week, as well as his own incendiary comments about the violence.

Labour MPs Chi Onwurah and Dawn Butler, who are competing to chair parliament’s science, innovation and technology committee, both told POLITICO they’d press the billionaire X owner and other technology executives to answer questions about the role of social media platforms amid mounting unrest in the U.K.

Musk has spent days beefing with British politicians over the riots, and is locked in a war of words with Prime Minister Keir Starmer over the U.K's handling of them. Musk on Sunday wrote “civil war is inevitable” in the U.K. and claimed that the response by U.K. police has been “one-sided."


British MPs want to haul Elon Musk before parliament over riots

Laurie Clarke (POLITICO)
in reply to MicroWave

Media Bias Fact Checker
Media Bias Fact Checker
• •

::: spoiler Politico Europe - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Politico Europe:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - Germany
Wikipedia about this source
:::


::: spoiler Search topics on Ground.News
politico.eu/article/united-kin…
:::
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support


Media Bias/Fact Check - Search and Learn the Bias of News Media

We are the most comprehensive media bias resource on the internet. There are currently 3900+ media sources listed in our database and growing every day. Don’t be fooled by Fake News sources.
Media Bias Fact Check
in reply to MicroWave

RubberDuck
RubberDuck
• •
And he will just politely decline.
in reply to RubberDuck

phdepressed
phdepressed
• •
"Politely" is doubtful. Same guy who told his advertisers to go fuck themselves and now is suing them for not using his platform anymore.
in reply to phdepressed

RubberDuck
RubberDuck
• •
Sarcasm does not translate well in writing.. but I refuse to use /s.. but yes.
in reply to RubberDuck

dactylotheca
dactylotheca
• •

Love it that you're getting downvoted for this highly controversial comment.

Proof #52895167698 that downvotes shouldn't even be a thing

in reply to dactylotheca

RubberDuck
RubberDuck
• •
Yeah.. really hurtful all those negative internet points. I don't care though. They do serve as sort of a thermometer of the comment. But in this case.. it makes me smile.
in reply to RubberDuck

Carrolade
Carrolade
• •

Funny thing to me about downvoters is they don't seem to realize everyone likes to look for the downvoted posts because they're often the most amusing. There's a reason "controversial" is one of the first few sorting options.

My hypothesis is they're mostly the younger people on the platform, trying to rely on peer pressure like this is HS or something, because that's all they've really experienced so far in their lives.

in reply to RubberDuck

dactylotheca
dactylotheca
• •
Oh yeah it's not like it makes any real difference – although the points may be fake, whether we like it or not people do seem to let them influence how they look at a comment or post. It's just a bit silly that so many people cling to the idea that downvotes are a valuable tool (apparently we'd be overrun with nazis if we couldn't downvote things)
in reply to dactylotheca

GiuseppeAndTheYeti
GiuseppeAndTheYeti
• •
Nah. Downvotes should exist to show how unpopular radical or extremist views really are. It doesn't apply here obviously, but I think the reason Meta and Twitter etc. are so negative/toxic is because you can't discourage that content on popular posts. It just looks like there's fewer likes.
in reply to GiuseppeAndTheYeti

dactylotheca
dactylotheca
• •

Many Lemmy instances do just fine without them though, and unpopular extremist views are still unpopular. Frankly that sounds more like a case for moderation than downvotes.

One of the main problems I have with downvotes on Lemmy is that when people browse All, niche communities tend to attract a lot of drive-by downvotes (which is why many instances that host them opted to disable downvotes) that tend to drown out votes by people who are actually in those communities and push the content lower when using a sort that takes votes into account.

Yes there's all sorts of lofty ideas about how downvotes should be used, and eg people are not "supposed" to downvote things just because they disagree (and no I'm not talking nazism here). Never goes that way in real life.

in reply to dactylotheca

P00ptart
P00ptart
• •
So far in my time on lemmy, browsing all means I have to block most communities I come across. Not because they're invalid, usually because I don't speak the language. It's simply clutter to me. That being said I really wish there weren't hundreds of new anime instances every day. It's getting really old blocking them and thinking you've gotten rid of them all, then 15 more pop up. I don't downvote in either situation, just kind of a sidebar here.
in reply to MicroWave

Warl0k3
Warl0k3
• •

Yeeeeah no. As much as I despise musk, the UK doesn't get to call a US citizen into parliment, we fought a war about that one.

(So uh, just as an aside, go after his business interests. You'll nail that fucker to the wall if you snag his UK investments. We haven't gotten around to fighting the war against capitalism...)

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to Warl0k3

Sarah Brown
Sarah Brown
•

@Warl0k3 @MicroWave give you one guess where his private jet lands every time he comes through Europe …

He may want to cooperate.

@MicroWave @Warl0k3

reshared this

in reply to Warl0k3

NegativeInf
NegativeInf
• •

Can't they call him in due to him being the owner of the company and stoking racist riots via that companies only product in attempt to destabilize their government?

Tho I guess you really only could request it. Unless Twitter is doing actual business in the UK, which for adverts and now with the pay outs for tweeting, they probably are. But even then, one would probably only get the bootlicking CEO Yackinasackarino.

in reply to NegativeInf

Flying Squid
Flying Squid
• •
They can call him in for having a K in his name. They could summon Vladimir Putin if they wanted. There's no restrictions on who they can summon as far as I know.
in reply to Warl0k3

Flying Squid
Flying Squid
• •
the UK doesn’t get to call a US citizen into parliment, we fought a war about that one.


I know American history classes suck, but I didn't realize they sucked this badly.

Parliament can call summon anyone they like anywhere in the world. Whether or not the person they summon is required to go depends on local laws.

Believe it or not, even if the U.S. had a "you can't summon us to parliament, so there" clause in the Constitution, the British could say "fuck your constitution" and do the summoning anyway.

in reply to Flying Squid

unexposedhazard
unexposedhazard
• •

Dude has rot in his brain like damn. Yes he can always just run away, but that wont improve his situation. If you dont answer when you are accused, the sentencing will happen without you. If the UK and EU ban twitter, he wont like that, so its in his own best interest to show up.

If you wanna do business somewhere, you will answer to the laws of that place or deal with the consequences.

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to unexposedhazard

Flying Squid
Flying Squid
• •
Sure, I was speaking in more general terms about the bizarre claim that we fought a war to stop the UK Parliament from summoning Americans.
in reply to Flying Squid

The Quuuuuill
The Quuuuuill
• •
I mean... That was one of our formal complaints that all criminal trials in colonial American times happened in England instead of locally before a jury of peers, but to ignore the entire legal tradition of jurisdiction and extradition to focus entirely on that is... Dumb. Even then I'm pretty sure Patrick Henry would agree if Elon Musk committed a crime in London, where he should be tried is London. The argument the thread starter is making requires ignoring what the actual formal complaints was and instead flattening it into a simplified version that basically translates to "lol england bad"
in reply to unexposedhazard

brucethemoose
brucethemoose
• •
Musk is a narcissist, so he's probably thining the UK wouldn't dare ban Twitter, now that he's made it so awesome.
This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to Flying Squid

Warl0k3
Warl0k3
• •
This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to Warl0k3

The Quuuuuill
The Quuuuuill
• •
There's a difference between a request and a subpoena. Right now They're discussing basically politely asking. If they want to subpoena him they'll have to make an extradition request, at which point America will look over the details of the case and decide if they want to cooperate. It happens literally all the time. Sometimes we cooperate. Sometimes we don't. Usually because Britain is our ally, we cooperate.
in reply to Warl0k3

xmunk
xmunk
• •
You do realize that Musk is a citizen of two commonwealth countries (in addition to the fact that parliament can demand whatever the fuck they want - and that doesn't necessarily mean it will happen).
in reply to Warl0k3

Will420
Will420
• •
As a businessman with major companies operating in the UK. Who is inciting racial hatred and riots. Parliament has a right to request him to appear. I don't believe that they can even order a UK private citizen to appear before them. Unless they're a civil servant.
in reply to Warl0k3

intensely_human
intensely_human
• •
Capitalism has been fought and defeated many times. Each time it went just about as well as beating medicare.
in reply to MicroWave

mrmule
mrmule
• •
Why not just block that whole dumpster fire
in reply to MicroWave

BrightCandle
BrightCandle
• •
He has clearly been inciting the riots online. Treat him like all the other instigators of this and put out an arrest warrant for terrorism. He should stand in a court room and answer for his actions like everyone else, the billions shouldn't mean he gets to talk to parliament first.
in reply to MicroWave

SlopppyEngineer
SlopppyEngineer
• •
Promise the protesters you'll squeeze rich people like Musk and his companies for all they're worth to solve the issues with housing and NHS to start with.
in reply to MicroWave

Optional
Optional
• •
I was hoping they meant “keel-haul Musk” because I approve this message.
in reply to MicroWave

hungryphrog
hungryphrog
• •
What has that fucker done again?!
in reply to hungryphrog

Will420
Will420
• •
Added to the false narrative that the killer of three little girls at a Taylor Swift themed party at a holiday daycare center. Was a migrant who had just gotten off a small boat and was on an MI5/MI6 watchlist. Which has ledt to a few relatively sporadic race riots from the far right. And now saying that Civil War in the UK is inevitable.
in reply to Will420

hungryphrog
hungryphrog
• •
I wonder how much better the world would be if that guy learned to shut up...
in reply to MicroWave

njm1314
njm1314
• •
As they should. Online grifters should be held accountable for the lives they destroy.
in reply to MicroWave

sudo42
sudo42
• •
Musk is really upping his asshole game. He's alienated 50% of the US, a good bit of Norway and now Britain.
in reply to MicroWave

Novman
Novman
• •
Not from uk, but do you really believe that one person comment or a single criminal event can cause such a mess? It is like saying the troubles were caused by a speech of ian paisley. In uk you have huge examples of revolts/wars between different populations ( irish/english/welsh/scottish ) but this time is a comment the cause... seeing from outside it seems ... weird
This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to Novman

ticklesyourinsides
ticklesyourinsides
• •
He owns the site. The site is a shit hole of hate and it spreads lies. So yes he should be held accountable.
in reply to ticklesyourinsides

Novman
Novman
• •
Any media spread hate against other groups/spread lies. Or you have even read any newspaper in the past 100 years. I read reddit and i read the worst things about adversarial groups any day. Sometime even war crimes apologies, a post was so terrible that could be used as a war crimes proff ( a drone targeting and killing a medical unit doing their work during wartime ). But it is very rare that this kind of speech cause some riots. Ex: never heard of democrats targeting republicans with riots in USA. The strange thing is that russians tell that usa and uk are using the social to promote colored revolutions ( and is x is between them ). So X is an instrument of CIA / MI5 or a russian asset? When the troubles erupted were more simple time.
in reply to Novman

fellowmortal
fellowmortal
• •

Thanks for your uninformed opinion/question thing. I'll assume that you are asking in good faith and simply don't know... much about the UK.

He isn't the root cause, but he chose to insert himself by encouraging violence when he hasn't a fucking clue what he's talking about either...


UK disorder: What's Elon Musk's game?

X’s owner has chosen to wade in to opine on unrest in the UK. It isn't clear what's driving him.
Marianna Spring (BBC News)
in reply to fellowmortal

Novman
Novman
• •
I don't think that uk political class too ( as other european countries ) know much about Uk. I have direct experience about "communities" in other european countries, but when the problems erupt, the ruling class flee. I don't think about a civil war, the situation is more complex than it happears and i think that is very difficult that labour starting seriously to wage war to their voter base. Musk is part of the capitalist globalist elite that is causing all this mess ( like tories ).
in reply to Novman

symthetics
symthetics
• •
You seems surprised and yet Trump has been charged with almost the same thing for inciting the Jan 6th riots.
in reply to Novman

Lorela
Lorela
• •

I'm not understanding your comparison to the Troubles, because Paisley was the lead figure who fuelled the fires of religious hate through his influence, having founded a number of the groups involved in the incidents that kicked off the Troubles.

Maybe it wasn't a single speech that caused it, but he was very much the face of the loyalist movement for most of his life.

in reply to Lorela

Novman
Novman
• •
The one of the reasons of the irish hate against the english were the plantations of ulster. Not a single speech. I suppose that you know a little bit of ulster history.
in reply to Novman

Lorela
Lorela
• •

Paisley of course being instrumental in those 'plantations' - i just thought it weird to suggest he didn't start the Troubles, when he pretty much did.

Not to say Musk is comparable - he's not even close to the main actor here. But he is a public figure who has been using the social media platform he owns to stir up hatred against particular groups of people in the UK. And not just on this occasion, he's been chiming in for years.

in reply to Lorela

Novman
Novman
• •
Plantations were far older than paisley and the troubles. The timeline of historical events is numbered in centuries or millenia. Jewish diaspora started 2000 years ago, mediterranean division between religions 1400 years ago. The changes due to mass migration in europe will continue for centuries, changing the shape and the ideology of the nations for a very long time. Some nations will be born, some other will die.
in reply to MicroWave

beefbot
beefbot
• •

Not trying to minimise this

But this also works as a test drive for what he can do in the US

in reply to MicroWave

nifty
nifty
• •

Under what law would the UK govt do this though? I am not sure it’s a great idea since Musk is a private citizen and not a government actor. Would any govt then extend this precedent to any viral comment? Like the person who made the JD Vance couch comment?

OTOH, Musk is in a unique position because of his money and influence, that a normal commentator does not have. So I don’t know, but seems like a legal quagmire.

If however Musk is shown to funnel money to UK PACs persons or parties via any means, then the UK govt has a case to question him as a hostile foreign operator. But otherwise it seems like a tricky scenario. Perhaps the same legalities around the Assange case extend to this? But Assange was a sympathetic figure in many respects. I am not sure Musk has the same freedom of press and speech justifications.

in reply to nifty

WarlordSdocy
WarlordSdocy
• •
I think it's more over the fact that he runs the platform and therefore if his platform helped stoke the flames that caused this then it's completely valid for him to be brought in to be questioned about his involvement and what X will do in the future to combat racism and misinformation.
in reply to WarlordSdocy

Fire Witch
Fire Witch
• •
what X will do in the future to combat racism and misinformation.


Laughable

in reply to Fire Witch

WarlordSdocy
WarlordSdocy
• •
Yeah the answer is obviously nothing cause it's Elon but still it's the same type of thing when the US brings in people like Zuckerberg to talk about what their platforms are doing.
in reply to nifty

Obi
Obi
• •
Free speech in the UK does not include hate speech or inciting violence, so that's probably all they need, doesn't matter that he's an individual, in fact it probably makes it much simpler since that makes it not a diplomatic issue.
in reply to MicroWave

somenonewho
somenonewho
• •

Less to the point of the article and more to it's wording:

Why the fuck do they call it "race riots" as far as I can tell there are a bunch of rioting fascists and then a broad group of people (refugees, local citizens and Antifa) trying to defend places or stop the riots. This is not a black vs white fight this fight is between fascism and anti-fascism (or at least democracy)

in reply to somenonewho

devnev
devnev
• •
Why do you think it's more fascist or than racist? The political "right" of the UK is incredibly anti-immigrant, you can see that in how they've voted for MPs and Brexit. The racial hate is more noticeable towards brown people, i.e. anyone looking anything from Arab to south Asian, there's even the p-word that comes close (but isnt quite) the equivalent of the n-word.
in reply to devnev

somenonewho
somenonewho
• •
Sorry I didn't mean to imply that the Nazis aren't racist I definitely know that. For me it's just a different framing between "There are Race riots" (i.e. riots/fights between racial identies) vs fascist/racists rioting because of their racists reasons (and people fighting them in a (self)defense way. I hope I made clear what I meant.
in reply to somenonewho

devnev
devnev
• •
I see what you mean, thanks. Maybe of interest, the Oxford English dictionary defines a race riot as "a public outbreak of violence due to racial antagonism", much less specific than your definition which I imagine is America-based, so I think this might be a difference between American and European use of the term.
in reply to somenonewho

roguetrick
roguetrick
• •
Most race riots were just group victimization of the minority. See the zoot suit riots where they straight up hunted down brown men and boys, beat them, and undressed them. It didn't historically imply that the minority was the cause and doesn't now.
in reply to devnev

Kiernian
Kiernian
• •

The word that's the first four letters of a country's name is that serious of an insult now?

I'm a yank so I'm pretty out of touch on this but I was under the apparently mistaken impression that it was no more serious than calling an Irishman a mick or a paddy (neither of which are awesome but don't approach the derogatory ferocity of the T- word for Roman Catholic Irish).

in reply to Kiernian

BluesF
BluesF
• •
I would advise not doing that in Ireland. Anyway, yes, p*** has a comparable if not so extreme or long history as the n-word in the UK.
in reply to Kiernian

SomeBloke
SomeBloke
• •
Different countries have different insults, simple as. Calling someone a spook means radically different things on both ends of the Atlantic.
in reply to MicroWave

suction
suction
• •
Today in “Stop! I can only get so hard!! 😖😰” news…
in reply to MicroWave

frunch
frunch
• •
Love how this guy's one of the richest people in the world yet he's got nothin better to do than fuck with the common folk. Guess he doesn't get enough attention at home, so here we are watching him stoke racism and stupidity to entertain his pathetic insecure self
in reply to frunch

TankovayaDiviziya
TankovayaDiviziya
• •
Love how this guy's one of the richest people in the world yet he's got nothin better to do than fuck with the common folk.

to entertain his pathetic insecure self


To those who have finished watching the first season of Squid Game, this observation is prescient.

Capitalism replaced feudalism; and the new aristocrats are the billionaires.

in reply to frunch

roguetrick
roguetrick
• •

It's actually so much simpler than that. He's tweaked the Twitter algorithm to serve more right wing brain rot for engagement and, being a habitual user, rotted his own fucking brain more and more. He's indirectly self radicalizing. He's getting high on his own supply.

At least zuck doesn't actually use that shithole called Facebook.

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to MicroWave

Etterra
Etterra
• •
I doubt they could do it since Musky is a US citizen. I didn't know the laws for this kind of thing though, so maybe they could with the right kind of legalese?
in reply to Etterra

dev_null
dev_null
• •
I guess he can ignore a court summons, but then he can never enter the UK again, which he might want to do at some point.
in reply to Etterra

UniquesNotUseful
UniquesNotUseful
• •

They have some powers, they got upset at Facebook and decided to flex a bit by sending one of the boys around, to invite one of his mates for a chat.

theguardian.com/technology/201…

The person sent was the serjeant at arms. They carry a sword. Doubt they took it out but they also carry one of the House of Commons maces, which is gold covered and jewel encrusted, about 1.5m (4.9ft) long and weighs roughly 10kg (22 lbs).

Imagine some large, pissed off looking dude, dressed like he’s from the year 1415, kicking your hotel door in because you didn’t RSPV properly. Then being told hand over documents or we may stick you in jail (and you know the pretended it would be the Tower of London).

The 1,000 yard stare he must get when asked if he enjoyed London and how lovely that history must be.


Parliament seizes cache of Facebook internal papers

Documents alleged to contain revelations on data and privacy controls that led to Cambridge Analytica scandal
Carole Cadwalladr (The Guardian)
in reply to MicroWave

abbiistabbii
abbiistabbii
• •
Let's fucking go. Drag this fucker Infront of parliament.
in reply to MicroWave

jaemo
jaemo
• •
Shitheels has a fucking opinion on how to run everything it seems. Clear sign he should run nothing, since the only thing being actually run is his fucking mouth.
in reply to MicroWave

Embarrassingskidmark
Embarrassingskidmark
• •
I think we should strap Elon Musk to one of his rockets & launch him directly into the sun... Or maybe just like a big wall, that might be more entertaining.
in reply to MicroWave

LillyPip
LillyPip
• •
They should. It’s nuts this motherfucker has the influence he does. He’s an actual dipshit who’s only able to do this because he was born into money and failed upwards. He’s a moron with outsized influence. Hold him to account, please.
⇧