in reply to Luke

@Luke Exactly that! Here in Portugal, things seem corrupt because there's a lot of, "oh, you want this service. My friend works there. Let me have a word and you can jump the queue".

Which is "corrupt", but "Imma just create a shell company in the British Virgin Islands and you can award it an M25 widening scheme which I won't actually bother delivering, and instead I'll donate 80% of it back to 'charitable causes', as run by your good self, and we'll see what's what. Golf later?" isn't.

@Luke
in reply to Sarah Brown

Something deeply unsavoury is going to on with building management in London as well. The management company gets quotes from their three preferred contactors who are all 100 miles away and charge £80 extra to remove 1 bag of rubbish that could have gone into the communal skip. And the roof still leaks afterwards.
in reply to Charles ☭ is now tooting from queer.party

@CharLES ☭ H yeah. It’s like this at every single level. This is how one of the richest countries in the world is so grubby. The money is getting skimmed, everywhere.

reshared this

in reply to Sarah Brown

@celesteh 100 miles away from where Charles lives is where I live, many of the property management companies are round here and fight like rats for the "big ticket" contracts from London, turning down work in the local area (as they won't pay the inflated prices) and adding to the traffic problems on the A12, M11 and M25 every rush hour (which leads to many collisions including fatalities)
in reply to Sarah Brown

Ah, but white-collar crime isn’t really crime, is it?

If we had to suddenly examine the UK for building a worldwide money laundering and reinvestment scheme, the SFO would be very busy … if that’s too much, they could check out every closed-shortlist ‘competitive tender process’ … although that would also take a while …

in reply to Sarah Brown

Jersey for instance has a personal tax rate of 20% max for residents, and 0% for corporations based there [0]. My understanding is that all you need to do is register a company there and your business doesn’t pay tax on that money.

As far as I am aware the same is true of places like the Cayman Islands.

The Spider’s Web is a great documentary about this

[1][0] investopedia.com/ask/answers/0…

[1] youtu.be/np_ylvc8Zj8?si=8fuTPG…

in reply to Sarah Brown

It's worth bearing in mind that London is often referred to as the laundromat of the world for dirty money.

It's also nicknamed Londongrad because of all the oligarchs hiding their stolen billions in luxury houses that sit empty.

People don't realise how corrupt the UK is because the British (let's be honest mainly English) know how to spin, minimise, evade & manipulate like no others. Even the British public has zero clue just how corrupt it is.

in reply to Semi Sentient AI Cooling Water

@sentient_water
There's also the vast majority of English people who are not entitled, nor are they from rich lineages, and they get pretty fucking sick of being blamed for everything and tarred with the same brush as the Etonian establishment.

Also, there are Scottish and Welsh amongst the elite, not just "English."

in reply to Sarah Brown

The writer and mafia expert Robert Saviano said in an interview a few years ago that the most corrupt country in the world was indeed the UK because of all the dirty money flowing to London from around the world.
archive.rai-see.org/uk-is-most…
in reply to Jim Heartney

wild speculation

@Jim Heartney @Sarah Brown Key word "generally". The roundabout is better a lot of the time, and many traffic light crossings would benefit from being turned into roundabouts, but it's not a strictly better solution in every single case.

It depends on the traffic volumes and the space available to build a roundabout that fits the traffic volumes. This could be one of the cases where the roundabout was rationally a mistake.

Or it could be an irrational fear or annoyance with roundabouts, or the mentioned corruption.

in reply to clacke: exhausted pixie dream boy 🇸🇪🇭🇰💙💛

wild speculation

Sensitive content

This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to Sarah Brown

The trick is to bid as part of a consortium where one or more members of the group is/are located somewhere where beneficial ownership is not disclosable. This did not start in 2010 - some years before I came close to blocking this particular ploy on a particular public contract - only to find that somewhere else nearby it had been already accepted. To clean this up will need both #HMTreasury and the #publicaccountscommittee on board.
in reply to Donald Roy

Which will make who gets the chair of the #publicaccountscommittee next month quite important. The chair has to be chosen from the official opposition - namely the #conservatives although all members of the #houseofcommons vote in a secret ballot. One possibility is #jessenorman - who has something of a reputation for integrity and intelligence - and whose partner - #katebingham - served the #uk well during the pandemic.
in reply to Sarah Brown

America works the same way! There's very little bribery, because the Supreme Court has chosen to define bribery as "handing an official a cartoon bag with a dollar sign on it full of money, and then they immediately carry out an official act."

Wait five minutes before the official act? Bag doesn't have a dollar sign on it? Not bribery!

in reply to Captain Jack Sparrow

@Captain_Jack_Sparrow @partnumber2 You completely avoided what you said to me.

Great debating style. By the way I noticed your toots on the genocide going on in Palestine. Well looky who got that shit started.

"Gardner Thompson, a British historian, traces the arc of this seminal development in Legacy of Empire: Britain, Zionism And The Creation Of Israel, published by Saqi Books in London. A specialist in British colonial policy in Africa, he argues that the Arab-Jewish conflict in Palestine was precipitated by Zionist colonization and fostered by Britain."

Then there's India, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland & of course the indigenous people of America. The British have a reputation for genocide, exploitation & subjugation of billions of people throughout history.

But please tell us why you're their biggest fanboy?

Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source

Alex Leathard

@omegaprobe Essentially, yes; that’s my understanding.

But it’s only ever _partially_ repaid because no government claws back 100% of its spending back through taxation.

Someone, somewhere, in the pyramid that trickles down from central government spending, saves in a way that limits what government can reclaim.

Plus, the humans running governments place different value on different types of value exchange, e.g. capital gains vs VAT.

Unknown parent

friendica (DFRN) - Link to source

Sarah Brown

@OddOpinions5 So you pluck 1% from ... somewhere, and then call it "waste", rather than what it is, blatant theft from the British people.

Even if it's as small as you assert, that is 12 billion pounds stolen by these wankers, from ordinary people, for their own enrichment.

A truly staggering amount of money, and that's after you tried to minimise it.

Found the Tory.

Unknown parent

friendica (DFRN) - Link to source

Sarah Brown

@OddOpinions5 No. Using shell companies to skim billions off of infrastructure projects and donating it back to the people who awarded it isn't "waste". It's blatant, shameless theft.

And yours is the sort of attitude which allows it to continue, while those responsible then stand up in parliament and rant about "benefits fraud" and "illegal immigrants stealing our money".

in reply to Sarah Brown

There's a reason there's Londongrad.

UK is probably one of the most corrupt countries in the western world. This came to the fore around brexit. There's so much corruption lingering on of 'jolly fine chaps' doing what 'jolly fine chaps' do, i.e. have a word with a friend, or a friend of a friend and whoopee, more cash. Think Greensill. If it were in e.g. France, Cameron would be in jail. Instead, he's been made a Lord.

in reply to Grant

@Grant That last Prime Minister of Portugal resigned because his chief of staff had been alleged to have a financial interest in the award of a lithium mining contract. This caused the government to collapse.

Can you seriously imagine a Tory Prime Minister resigning because one of his staff was financially involved with a company being awarded a national contract, let alone it causing fresh elections? The idea that there was even anything wrong with it would be ridiculous to them.

Yet Portugal is "corrupt" and the UK is not, apparently.

Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source

Captain Jack Sparrow

I agree, England has a high level of ignorance and a dominant RW press, unfortunately

However generally less than 50% vote tory, even in 2019 when the tories won a landslide. I think that was 47% of the English vote.

Most ppl vote for a more progressive parties.
It's a free fediverse though, if you want to carry on hating an entire nation because of the evils committed by their elite, (and I'm not denying they happen) that is up to you. Goodbye.

This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to Semi Sentient AI Cooling Water

@sentient_water @partnumber2
Am I their biggest fanboy? That's news to me, I just ask that people distinguish between the British governments and establishment, and British (or English) commoners, who are also frequently downtrodden by their own elite.

I think you have a chip on your shoulder, old boy.

Also, I am entitled to my own opinions about the genocide Israel is committing in Gaza. If you don't like that, then feel free to fuck off.

in reply to Captain Jack Sparrow

@Captain_Jack_Sparrow @partnumber2 Nope that's you. Refer to the first thing I posted. I explicitly excluded the Scottish & Welsh & majority of the English from my point.

But your thin skinned defensiveness suggests you're heavily invested in the English being seen as noble distributors of civilisation.

in reply to Semi Sentient AI Cooling Water

oh, please fuck off.

I am neither in denial or in defense of any of the many evils committed by the British empire, and have never said anything in their defense.

My only point is that not "all English" are in support of their establishment, nor should they be held in the same contempt.

Sorry if that is too difficult for you to comprehend.

This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to Captain Jack Sparrow

@Captain_Jack_Sparrow @partnumber2 This is what you responded to. Where I'm very clearly not making a generalisation. You replied to this. This is what you've been basing your whole tirade on.

'People don't realise how corrupt the UK is because the British (let's be honest mainly English) know how to spin, minimise, evade & manipulate like no others. Even the British public has zero clue just how corrupt it is."

You engaged with me. You started insulting me. You wouldn't drop it. But please tell everyone how I'm the bully.