I'm worried by this story: theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/j…

Yes, Fujitsu must shoulder some blame for the faulty technology, and possibly more for being in denial. But Fujitsu did not choose to pursue the users for the "missing" money and prosecute them. There is a considerable human side to this story. We must not let the Post Office offload all the financial responsibility onto Fujitsu.

"We only acted like complete bastards because their software fucked up." won't cut it.

reshared this

in reply to Conor Titania Mc Bride

has there been reporting on the cause of the miscalculation? Was it a bug? Or a bad design decision? Or an incorrect assumption? Or did the requirements provided by the PO ask them to do it that way?

Then, who tested the system? If the PO have signed it off as being functionally correct, then doesn't that make them partially liable too?