CW ukpol, transphobia
I have the luxury of not needing to vote Labour to keep anyone out, but I had let myself believe there was some sort of political hope. I guess it's just as well Labour let us all know it's not them.
I have the luxury of not needing to vote Labour to keep anyone out, but I had let myself believe there was some sort of political hope. I guess it's just as well Labour let us all know it's not them.
Ben Evans
in reply to Alexandra Lanes • • •@considermycat I am utterly unconvinced by those of my friends who are honestly claiming that the larger his majority is, the more Starmer will feel emboldened to be more radical in Government.
I believe that he has already shown us exactly who he is, and that the larger his majority is, the more he'll be encouraged to behave exactly as he has done in opposition.
IMO, it is *Labour* that need to be tactically voted against, not the Tories (who are toast). 1/
Alexandra Lanes likes this.
Alexandra Lanes reshared this.
Ben Evans
in reply to Ben Evans • • •Sensitive content
@considermycat A bloody nose, a few winnable seats lost to a split progressive vote will, IMO, do far more to buck his ideas up.
Given the sort of political animal Starmer has shown himself to be, I feel the goal is to make him realize that if he wants a second term, he cannot treat us with the contempt that he has done thus far.
Far from a "ming vase", he's implemented a "Ming the Merciless" strategy, and I'll have none of it. /2
Alexandra Lanes likes this.
geekylou :transgender_flag:
in reply to Alexandra Lanes • • •kæt
in reply to Alexandra Lanes • • •@considermycat
Unlike Ben(*), I do think that a larger majority will make the government more radical. I agree that I don't think that Starmer will want it, but I think the natural Peoples Front of Judea tendencies in the party will make it happen. Maybe I'm just overused to the Labour/TUC conferences of the eighties, but there's gonna be factions, right?
I don't see much point voting elsewhere, tbh. The tories are worse, the Lib Dems are untrustworthy (given bastards will always exist, look which party enabled the 2010 government which set this whole disaster going, and achieved none of their major policy goals) and the others don't have enough of the population agreeing with their policies, to make it just an ethical-vanity vote.
(*) The wider ActivityPub world is still a bit of a mystery to me. I can't comment, but I don't know if I'm not allowed or can't find the button.