I wonder what the copyright implications of that could be. If the program claims the plagiarism bot with no copyright protection did it, is it harder to defend copyright even if it was actually done by a human?
To me it sounded like Adobe is pointing out that all digital art has an "art of the programmer upon a processor" layer. AI is a very indistinct term, so its poetic license is relatively unrestricted.
@johntinker Yes, I've read and quite enjoyed my Baudrillard, but no average person would ever believe that that was Adobe's intent, and frankly it's wildly improbable that a public relations team at a large public company would ever mean something like what you claim NY that statement.
@Resuna I did selective subject mask which I then modified by hand. I guess it decided that picking out the subject, something we used to do with convolution matrices, now counts as "AI".
It's like how Firefox decided that if you turned off "AI" that would also turn off the translation function. Calling these kinds of generative algorithms AI was not just marketing, it let them muddy the waters in terrible terrible ways. :(
Congratulations you are now an honorary AI! Your job is secure and you will be paid a fortune in tokens while the humans around you whither and disintegrate.
Mark Hurst
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •Sorro
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •Sensitive content
Asbestos
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •FoolishOwl
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •ShadowInTheVoid
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •John Tinker
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •Eleanor Saitta
in reply to John Tinker • • •I can't imagine anyone actually believing that.
John Tinker
in reply to Eleanor Saitta • • •Simulacrum: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulacr…
Simulacrum - Wikipedia
Contributors to Wikimedia projects (Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.)Eleanor Saitta
in reply to John Tinker • • •Yes, I've read and quite enjoyed my Baudrillard, but no average person would ever believe that that was Adobe's intent, and frankly it's wildly improbable that a public relations team at a large public company would ever mean something like what you claim NY that statement.
witless
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •Kevin Boyd (he/him) 🇨🇦
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •Resuna
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •Sarah Brown
in reply to Resuna • •Resuna
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •Sarah Brown likes this.
Phosphenes
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •