Infinite growth also means that if you don't make it into product or project management by the age of 35, let alone stay with the same stack as you were working with 10 years ago, then there must be something wrong.
Why does all the personal funding require current enrollment in school? Why are all the internships only for students? Why do those certain jobs only hire recent graduates?
Age discrimination for exploitative employment of children under thirty
And of course the organisation ensures that "Rockstars" have (temporary) elevated status separating them from the crowd...
A long time ago, when there were more empowered workforces, excessive output was often prevented by maintaining norms that were agreed informally within groups.
(Case below of US factory workers in the1930s controlling each other's output through peer pressure)
A snippet from a textbook recounting the Hawthorne studies:
The researches at the bank wiring room observed how informal group norms systematically circumvented the official targets for production output (see figure 3.5). Management had set a production target of 7,200 switches per day for each workers, to get a bonus. Although the workers seemed capable of meeting the official bonus target, they tended to restrict there effort and produced less. The observers discovered that the workers believed that producing between 6,000 and 6,200 units was a fair day's work. Informal pressure asserted by the group, meant that workers were called look down upon and were called derogative names, such as "Shrimp", "Runt", "Slave", "Speed King"; breaking this norm meant the creation of an unfriendly atmosphere or even being subjected to physical violence, such as being hit on arm. Yet, workers who were too
A snippet from a textbook recounting the Hawthorne studies:
The researches at the bank wiring room observed how informal group norms systematically circumvented the official targets for production output (see figure 3.5). Management had set a production target of 7,200 switches per day for each workers, to get a bonus. Although the workers seemed capable of meeting the official bonus target, they tended to restrict there effort and produced less. The observers discovered that the workers believed that producing between 6,000 and 6,200 units was a fair day's work. Informal pressure asserted by the group, meant that workers were called look down upon and were called derogative names, such as "Shrimp", "Runt", "Slave", "Speed King"; breaking this norm meant the creation of an unfriendly atmosphere or even being subjected to physical violence, such as being hit on arm. Yet, workers who were too slow and produced less than 6,000 units were subjected to verbally abused by the supervisors. It showed how the informal norm of the group with its enforcement mechanism was incompatible with the intentions of management.
@andy Next to the snippet we have a "Figure 3.5: Informal group norms at the bank wiring room restricting output", showing four "levels" of output amount:
1. Output: Min. 7200 - Official Bonus Policy 2. Output: Above 6600 - Group Informal Pressure, with an arrow downwards suggesting that people are kept within or below this level 3. Output: 6000-6600 - Acceptable group level 4. Output: Below 6000 - Supervisor Informal Pressure, with an arrow upwards
Rockstar is an esoteric programming language based on the ‘lyrical conventions of 1980s hard rock songs and power ballads.’. It was created by Dylan Beattie in 2018.
A less charitable definition is "a dev on a team with Big Ideas, that does not want to reach an agreement with their co-workers, but instead asserts their will unilaterally".
Alda Vigdís
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •Sarah Brown likes this.
Sarah Brown
in reply to Alda Vigdís • •reshared this
Cainmark Does Not Comply 🚲 and Irving Reid reshared this.
Alda Vigdís
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •David
in reply to Alda Vigdís • • •Why does all the personal funding require current enrollment in school? Why are all the internships only for students? Why do those certain jobs only hire recent graduates?
Age discrimination for exploitative employment of children under thirty
Andy H3 likes this.
Andrew Padilla
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •Ryan
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •Sarah Brown likes this.
Andy H3
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •And of course the organisation ensures that "Rockstars" have (temporary) elevated status separating them from the crowd...
A long time ago, when there were more empowered workforces, excessive output was often prevented by maintaining norms that were agreed informally within groups.
(Case below of US factory workers in the1930s controlling each other's output through peer pressure)
@Sarah Brown
lj·rk
in reply to Andy H3 • • •@andy #alt4you
A snippet from a textbook recounting the Hawthorne studies:
The researches at the bank wiring room observed how informal group norms systematically circumvented the official targets for production output (see figure 3.5). Management had set a production target of 7,200 switches per day for each workers, to get a bonus. Although the workers seemed capable of meeting the official bonus target, they tended to restrict there effort and produced less. The observers discovered that the workers believed that producing between 6,000 and 6,200 units was a fair day's work. Informal pressure asserted by the group, meant that workers were called look down upon and were called derogative names, such as "Shrimp", "Runt", "Slave", "Speed King"; breaking this norm meant the creation of an unfriendly atmosphere or even being subjected to physical violence, such as being hit on arm. Yet, workers who were too
... show more@andy #alt4you
A snippet from a textbook recounting the Hawthorne studies:
The researches at the bank wiring room observed how informal group norms systematically circumvented the official targets for production output (see figure 3.5). Management had set a production target of 7,200 switches per day for each workers, to get a bonus. Although the workers seemed capable of meeting the official bonus target, they tended to restrict there effort and produced less. The observers discovered that the workers believed that producing between 6,000 and 6,200 units was a fair day's work. Informal pressure asserted by the group, meant that workers were called look down upon and were called derogative names, such as "Shrimp", "Runt", "Slave", "Speed King"; breaking this norm meant the creation of an unfriendly atmosphere or even being subjected to physical violence, such as being hit on arm. Yet, workers who were too slow and produced less than 6,000 units were subjected to verbally abused by the supervisors. It showed how the informal norm of the group with its enforcement mechanism was incompatible with the intentions of management.
1/2
Andy H3 likes this.
lj·rk
in reply to lj·rk • • •@andy Next to the snippet we have a "Figure 3.5: Informal group norms at the bank wiring room restricting output", showing four "levels" of output amount:
1. Output: Min. 7200 - Official Bonus Policy
2. Output: Above 6600 - Group Informal Pressure, with an arrow downwards suggesting that people are kept within or below this level
3. Output: 6000-6600 - Acceptable group level
4. Output: Below 6000 - Supervisor Informal Pressure, with an arrow upwards
2/2
Ted Mielczarek
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •Sarah Brown
in reply to Ted Mielczarek • •@Ted Mielczarek I'm 51 and I'm expecting to be diagnosed next week.
I feel like I'm drowning.
Ted Mielczarek
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •Sarah Brown
in reply to Ted Mielczarek • •@Ted Mielczarek Yeah. Knowledge is certainly power.
But I mostly want lisdexamphetamine.
Ted Mielczarek
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •Jocelynephiliac
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •Trilobyte17
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •Rockstar
RockstarNate
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •Claus Cramon Houmann
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •zygmyd
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •This should be a LinkedIn post.
(You know you want to. You can, you know. Just open up that site and post. It'll only take a minute. Then you'll have done it.)
Sarah Brown
in reply to zygmyd • •zygmyd
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •