Skip to main content


Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks
in reply to Sarah Brown

re: Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks

Sensitive content

Unknown parent

Sarah Brown
re: Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks
@alex "we" can do whatever "we" like, Alex, but my wall, my rules.
Unknown parent

Sarah Brown
re: Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks
@alex Using them right now. You wanna pick a fight over this, do it with someone else. As we used to say in the old days, *plonk*
@alex
in reply to Sarah Brown

Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks

Sensitive content

in reply to evil robotwitch lunya :3 :neocat_floof_flag_trans:

Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks
@Evil Floofling lunya :neocat_floof_flag_trans: Possibly, but the ones I'm aware of who have just completely turned their brains to mush rant pretty exclusively about trans women.
in reply to Sarah Brown

Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks

Sensitive content

in reply to Sarah Brown

Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks

Sensitive content

in reply to Sarah Brown

Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks

Sensitive content

in reply to Sarah Brown

Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks

@sleepybisexual what I've anecdotally noticed about how they see trans men is that trans men get pushed into the "poor confused girl we need to protect" box and trans women get pushed into the villain box. Nonbinary gets pushed into either of those boxes depending on how they get viewed.

There's different kinds of transphobes that do something different with trans men, but the particular kind described in the OG post seem to do it this way.

in reply to Len

Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks

Sensitive content

in reply to evil robotwitch lunya :3 :neocat_floof_flag_trans:

Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks

@sleepybisexual There's definitely a way that trans men are also a basilisk to a certain kind of person! Just haven't seen the pattern yet. Publicly right now the focus is on trans women so it's also hard to pick out an impersonal pattern. I know nonbinary umbrella is also something like that to a certain kind of person (the "you can do that?" realisation turns into a nasty "how dare you try" reaction). Shaking up of norms in a way that a person can't get out of their head, for good or bad.

I do like the reframing of basilisks. Sometimes it's nice to feel powerful like that instead of threatened or intimidated.

in reply to Len

re: Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks

Sensitive content

in reply to Sarah Brown

re: Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks

@sleepybisexual it has to do with people being invested in gender sex normative roles in a certain way, so that facing the existence of transfemininity makes them conceive of it as such a threat, or absurd illogical concept, or whatever, that has them endlessly die trying to make sense of it.

obviously their cissexism affects all trans people, but trans women in particular are generally focused on due to the intersection of oppositional and traditional sexism in our case

in reply to evil robotwitch lunya :3 :neocat_floof_flag_trans:

re: Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks

Sensitive content

in reply to Sarah Brown

i have, in the past, referred to this as OOB (Out of Band - from the TCP protocol, i.e. data that has priority and jumps the queue directly to the hind brain). I also like the Out Of Context idea from Iain m banks's Excession, of something that is just do far out of a civilisalisation's (or person's) experience that it basically causes a hard stop and breaks it.
in reply to Sarah Brown

Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks

Sensitive content

in reply to Kathryn Karnage

re: Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks

Sensitive content

in reply to Sarah Brown

irrelevant? suggestion

Sensitive content

in reply to cwicseolfor

irrelevant? suggestion
@cwicseolfor Thanks. I don't have a Tumblr, but if you do, feel free to crosspost it in whatever form you feel appropriate.
in reply to Sarah Brown

Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks

Sensitive content

in reply to Sarah Brown

re: Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks
can you link me to a source where Rowling says trans people shouldn't exist at all because I'd like to bookmark it
in reply to feld

re: Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks

Sensitive content

in reply to feld

re: Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks
@feld I suspect my Google skills are no more developed than your own.
@feld
in reply to Sarah Brown

Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks

Sensitive content

in reply to Sarah Brown

Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks

Sensitive content

Sarah Brown reshared this.

in reply to Sarah Brown

Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks
Well this post’s replies are providing a target-rich environment for server blocking tedious wankers.
in reply to Sarah Brown

Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks

“When you say walking out into the road without looking may result in critical injury, you are being a Nazi ableist. I am a very good activist!”

Somebody appears to have mistaken this for Bluesky.

Bernie Sadly Does It reshared this.

in reply to Sarah Brown

re: Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks

Sensitive content

in reply to CharLES ☭ H

re: Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks
@CharLES ☭ H Individuals or servers?
in reply to Tattie

@Tattie OK, so this is interesting. I went and looked at this post as federated to mastodon.social and, it seems, most of the "you said bags of piss, you're a nazi!" responses aren't actually there.

Isn't that curious?

in reply to Sarah Brown

some victims lose 25 billion dollars buying a previously well regarded social media website and turning it into a shithole, just because trans women exist.

Fear us.

Marti reshared this.

in reply to Sarah Brown

Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks

Sensitive content

in reply to Jaycie

Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks
@Jaycie Oh yes!
in reply to Sarah Brown

Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks

Sensitive content

in reply to Sarah Brown

re: Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks

Sensitive content

in reply to Marcus

re: Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks
@Marcus Massive amounts of ginger in pot noodles
in reply to Sarah Brown

Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks

Sensitive content

in reply to Sarah Brown

re: Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks

Sensitive content

in reply to Sarah Brown

Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks

Sensitive content

Sarah Brown reshared this.

in reply to Sarah Brown

re: Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks

Sensitive content

in reply to geekylou :transgender_flag:

@geekylou ok so this is interesting, if it isn't a coincidence: JKR and Glinner both have history of first being criticised from the right. JKR for "promoting witchcraft", Glinner for "mocking the church".

It's almost as if they fell into a trap of thinking "well, at least the left will support me no matter what I do", and then when they actually get (correctly) criticised from the left, they feel betrayed. And not coincidentally, a lot of their cope seems to be strawmanning their critics to make it sound like right wing rather than left wing criticism.
@goatsarah

in reply to Sarah Brown

Long form - on transphobia and trans women as basilisks

Sensitive content

in reply to Sarah Brown

pun spoiler

Sensitive content