Skip to main content


in reply to Sarah Brown

I wonder to what extent this dehumanization comes from many cis men having exposure to trans people (that they know of) exclusively in pornography they consume.
in reply to Zach Nation

@Zach Nation plenty of them see cis women primarily as sex objects, mainly for that reason. It’s ironic that we are simultaneously seen as “even more sex object” and “even less woman” by the same people.

tarot bird reshared this.

in reply to Sarah Brown

I think it was similar with gay people a generation or so ago. Some straight people couldn’t look at a gay person without thinking about what they might get up to in the bedroom, or wherever. When I look at a person, I don’t immediately wonder what they do or don’t do in the bedroom & with whom.

I think this says a lot more about their personal insecurities about sex & gender than anything else, unless they’re just jumping on the bandwagon for political gain.

in reply to Looking for explanations…

@Susan60 I think you're right, but I also think that a lot of people gloss over how a lot of the activism that started to shift those perceptions wasn't always "polite".
in reply to Sarah Brown

I’m not sure I get you, unless you’re saying that some of the activism was pretty blatant & confrontational? Sometimes that is necessary, although it can also be counter-productive. There’s never just one “right” way to bring about change.
in reply to Sarah Brown

Wow. He was a bit OTT, but a lot of early rights campaigners in various movements felt obliged to be that way to force change and get people to sit up & take notice.
in reply to Sarah Brown

Honestly I don’t want to be around any of these reductionist fuckers obsessed with genitalia as defining personhood. Anyone who can’t keep their mind out of my pants I consider creepy and a potential danger.
in reply to Sarah Brown

Transphobe and homophobe's obsession with sexual organs will probably never cease to amaze me, but then, perhaps it's telling.

What you're saying is right, however. For what it's worth, it's a great, informative post.

in reply to Sarah Brown

:hugs:
I'm really not quite sure where we go from here, this kind of intentional failure of empathy - I don't know how we fix that.
in reply to mav

@mav :happy_blob: If we can’t make them quit their bullshit from empathy, then it’ll have to be shame.
@mav
in reply to Sarah Brown

in reply to randygalbraith

in reply to Sarah Brown

so for all its faults, the public health service here in Ireland has no problems sending me for mammograms. In fact, they strongly encouraged it and the endocrinologist said it might even be more important for trans women to get regular checks, but they don't have enough data.
in reply to Alanna

@Alanna yeah. There’s a bit of guesswork because our breasts tend to be younger, and lots of us don’t take progesterone. They don’t know enough.

I had my first mammogram in Portugal at 49, but I never told them I’m trans.

in reply to Sarah Brown

men can get breast cancer too and should check for lumps there
in reply to John_Loader

@John_Loader I was going to say, cis men get breast cancer too. But afaik trans women almost never get prostate cancer.
in reply to Ailbhe

@Ailbhe @John_Loader first line treatment for prostate cancer is the drugs that the media insists on calling “puberty blockers” (yes, exact same ones).

And since we already take blockers, or are castrated … well.

in reply to Sarah Brown

@John_Loader that makes sense. I was thinking if it was a real problem I would have seen one of the activists somewhere mention it at least once.
in reply to Sarah Brown