Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source

wizzwizz4

@metacosm It's the thing that is done, and there's a *kind* of obligation. See, for example, the Editor's Code (editorscode.org.uk/downloads/c… p21):

> If you can demonstrate your story is true, then it is unlikely that you will breach the Code if you do not approach the parties involved for comment. And if individuals have not been approached and dispute the story after publication, it is wise to publish their denial as swiftly as possible – unless you can prove the story is true.

in reply to Sarah Brown

The goal of a castle was indeed to make any siege cost more in time and manpower than it would take to break the castle. Holding out until allies could arrive, winter could set in, or food stocks in the surrounding area could be exhausted was the point. But it was a gamble because, if the invaders broke through, the retribution for forcing the siege would be terrible indeed.

The press doesn't have nearly that kind of power behind them. I love the idea of using their own impotence against them.

in reply to Sarah Brown

similar tip from doing press office stuff for the Vagina Museum: we get the occasional fucking awful requests for comment on what's clearly going to be a hit piece about a post using gender neutral language. Always reply with something steering away, e.g. if it was sparked by ovarian cancer they'd get a reply to the effect of "ovarian cancer is very serious. Here's the symptoms, it's important to be aware" and they'd never print it because they never wanted to talk about the real

reshared this

in reply to Another Angry Woman

personal favourite was when they decided go after a Polish activist doing a takeover on the abortion ban. Ignored the first couple, hit pieces were published. For all latter ones, just responded with "they're banning abortion in Poland, stop derailing" and those ones never went up lmao

Another Angry Woman reshared this.

in reply to Sarah Brown

Seems to me they’re not screwed at all, as they can either flat out lie or hedge with, “did not reply to our question by press time.”

Which is technically true: even if you replied to their email, if your response didn’t answer their question, then they can simply say you didn’t answer their question.

Sadly, the only real solution to this problem is for the general public to move to better press outfits, which is an issue coming and going, the lack of better press outfits PLUS a public that kind of likes the rubbish.