Discussing the British Press, and I'm reminded of the time when I had a moderate amount of celebrity in the UK LGBT community, and the press tried to do a hit piece on me.
Now here's the thing. There's a cheat code, and I'm going to explain what it is:
They will contact you for comment.
If you say nothing, they will publish the piece and say you were offered the chance to comment.
If you tell them to fuck off, they will publish the price and say your response was foul and unprintable.
I did neither of these things. I told them that this piece wasn't journalism. It was ridiculous tittle tattle and represented everything that was wrong with a failing and dying industry more obsessed with clickbait than proper reporting. I asked them if they didn't have proper news to report, and said that they should be ashamed of themselves.
They're basically screwed at that point. "We contacted Ms Brown for comment and she said that this was ridiculous tittle tattle and that the reporter should be ashamed of herself."
They're not gonna say that.
I'm struck by something one of my history teachers once said about medieval castles. They weren't meant to be impregnable. They were meant to be annoying enough that an invading army would decide to investigate other priorities instead.
The piece never ran.
If you're a trans person in the crosshairs of the British press, make yourself an annoying target. They're on a deadline, and if you make them conclude that life is too short, they will leave you the fuck alone.
like this
Ted, Hypolite Petovan, ezri, Demon Queen Lucretia, kravietz 🦇, Alexandra Lanes, Mikael, derf, ~! :blobcathearttrans:, Lux, weird autumn 🍂 :blobCatBounce:, scooter, Orolo, that biting transsexual nuisance, Ian Molton, scolobb, Closing Yellow Swans, Yui Deer, Amps, jmelesky, Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:, yuki - queen of the snow, Len, Saagar Jha, Izzy :nonbinary_potion: :BlobhajTransPrideHeart:, Cheetah Fluff, clonejo 2021-W42-3T13:37Z and Pippin like this.
reshared this
Conor Mc Bride, Koz Ross, anomalocaris, #DieMaskeBleibtAuf, modulux, Lain(e/o/a) Taffin Altman, timberwraith, Verity :transHaskell::verifiedtransfem:, Antoine Leblanc :transHaskell:, chronos, Colman Reilly, donAlvar_en :anarchoheart3:, Spencer, Yingtai, Glen Dudek, gz, Keira (She/Her), Val Packett :trans_verify:🧉, Astryr Cyberfæ :pentacle:, Porco Afterdark, HAIL THE ORB, La Ursidinoj (Bjornsdottirs), Pratik Patel, Alex Haven, Audrey MP [Astatide], Flowers, Passenger, Alana Mullen, Shy bunny, The Doctor, InfraredEyes, Sally Strange, hjhornbeck, 🦇 Jennie Rigg 🏳️🌈 (she/her), Rat Can't Read (she/her), BlackDutchSnark, ليلى النحلة, Crow, Nixie :leafeon:, Jessie Rowbum :progress_pride:, <p>Binkly <img src="https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/657738573012795405/1120099041263493171/small_both.jpg" alt="" /></p>, Samhain Night 4 Harris, DaSkinny ⚜️, Rich1047, Bluedepth, Maura Hubbell, Melissa :flag_transgender:, A Part of Bee, HeardinLondon 🥶, Sion [main], Richard Gadsden, scrottie (he/him/they), Jamellica, Weasel, Christine Burns MBE 🏳️⚧️📚⧖, Akshay | అక్షయ్, Michael_N_Payne, Kris Nuttycombe, RFanciola, Phil Harrison, 🇳𝗮ꜟ𝖼𝘩, Dendan Setia (Nins), Blaze "wertercatt" Marshall, Paul Douglas, ezri, Hilde Austlid, Daniel Hardy, Kara Goldfinch, Jonathan Schofield, Mr Salteena is not quite a gentleman, LambdaDuck, RolloTreadway, benjohn, Doug and 957 other people reshared this.
Ted
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •Don_Rubiel
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •The Boobook
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •@VickiWoodward
Sin Vega
in reply to The Boobook • • •Susi Arnott
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •John Caveney woke is me🛠️
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •Angela Glansbury 🚽
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •Sune Auken
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •Sarah Brown likes this.
Duncan
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •Sarah Brown likes this.
sagebiel
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •John Hobbs
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •Pia Herself :verifiedlesbian:
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •wizzwizz4
Unknown parent • • •@metacosm It's the thing that is done, and there's a *kind* of obligation. See, for example, the Editor's Code (editorscode.org.uk/downloads/c… p21):
> If you can demonstrate your story is true, then it is unlikely that you will breach the Code if you do not approach the parties involved for comment. And if individuals have not been approached and dispute the story after publication, it is wise to publish their denial as swiftly as possible – unless you can prove the story is true.
WarmasterPalak
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •The goal of a castle was indeed to make any siege cost more in time and manpower than it would take to break the castle. Holding out until allies could arrive, winter could set in, or food stocks in the surrounding area could be exhausted was the point. But it was a gamble because, if the invaders broke through, the retribution for forcing the siege would be terrible indeed.
The press doesn't have nearly that kind of power behind them. I love the idea of using their own impotence against them.
Another Angry Woman
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •like this
Sarah Brown and joel b like this.
reshared this
Another Angry Woman, Colman Reilly, jwz and Catherine Baker reshared this.
Another Angry Woman
in reply to Another Angry Woman • • •miawgogo :KirbyVerified: likes this.
Another Angry Woman reshared this.
Advanced Persistent Teapot
in reply to Another Angry Woman • • •Another Angry Woman
in reply to Advanced Persistent Teapot • • •like this
Sarah Brown and miawgogo :KirbyVerified: like this.
jwz reshared this.
Advanced Persistent Teapot
in reply to Another Angry Woman • • •Patsy (she/her)
in reply to Advanced Persistent Teapot • • •So it's a win-win strategy
rodlux
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •SeriousMoonlight
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •Sarah Brown likes this.
Seth should be writing
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •I LOVE this. It's so much better and more effective than the normal strategy people suggest for bullies which is "ignore it and they'll go away". No they won't.
Become and annoying target! Make them rethink their priorities if they're not going to get what they want out of you without a ton of effort.
volkris
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •Seems to me they’re not screwed at all, as they can either flat out lie or hedge with, “did not reply to our question by press time.”
Which is technically true: even if you replied to their email, if your response didn’t answer their question, then they can simply say you didn’t answer their question.
Sadly, the only real solution to this problem is for the general public to move to better press outfits, which is an issue coming and going, the lack of better press outfits PLUS a public that kind of likes the rubbish.
like jam or bootlaces
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •𝟙𝔸
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •lafnlab
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •Jonathan Koomey
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •Mx Amber Alex (she/it)
Unknown parent • • •Strypey
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •> [the British press] They're on a deadline, and if you make them conclude that life is too short, they will leave you the fuck alone.
That's fucking gold, thanks for sharing it.
like this
Ian Molton and Sarah Brown like this.
The Animal and the Machine
in reply to Sarah Brown • • •⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Excellent advice!