Yesterday was day 3 in Oxford, and the day I went into the MRI machine. They put me in scrubs and then I was fitted with some MRI safe glasses to my approximate prescription, and some earplugs. MRI machines are loud and they were very careful to make sure that the earplugs were snug enough that I wouldn't have my hearing damaged by the loud noises. This took some doing, as my right ear is not good at keeping things in it, but eventually the radiographer managed to wedge a lump of wax in there hard enough that it stayed put.
Then I was wedged into the machine itself, with a SpO2 measuring clip on my left middle finger and a squeezy alert bulb in my right hand, to squeeze if I panicked, or the machine got too loud, or basically anything. Under the fingers of my right hand were buttons to press to respond to computer tasks. A mirror above my head reflected a screen at the far end of the tube, which had instructions on it telling me what to do.
The first task was recalling various memories, good, neutral, and negative, so they could see what my brain did while I was d
... Show more...Yesterday was day 3 in Oxford, and the day I went into the MRI machine. They put me in scrubs and then I was fitted with some MRI safe glasses to my approximate prescription, and some earplugs. MRI machines are loud and they were very careful to make sure that the earplugs were snug enough that I wouldn't have my hearing damaged by the loud noises. This took some doing, as my right ear is not good at keeping things in it, but eventually the radiographer managed to wedge a lump of wax in there hard enough that it stayed put.
Then I was wedged into the machine itself, with a SpO2 measuring clip on my left middle finger and a squeezy alert bulb in my right hand, to squeeze if I panicked, or the machine got too loud, or basically anything. Under the fingers of my right hand were buttons to press to respond to computer tasks. A mirror above my head reflected a screen at the far end of the tube, which had instructions on it telling me what to do.
The first task was recalling various memories, good, neutral, and negative, so they could see what my brain did while I was doing this. After that there was a task where I had to select the "better" one of two symbols to win money, but there were no clues given as to what was better. I guess they wanted to see how my brain made decisions where there was a risk or reward at stake.
Being in the MRI was rather nice actually. Not too loud with the earplugs in. It just made random beepy buzzy noises while I got engrossed in the tasks I was being told to do in the screen. Really the only bad thing about it was that after 45 minutes or however long it was my neck really ached!
9/10 would have my hydrogen nuclei resonated again.
John Carlos Baez
in reply to Martin Escardo • • •- I can imagine a university being scared of personal web pages because of legal liability: someone could say something nasty on their web page. But a university that doesn't have personal web pages seems to be treating the faculty as mere employees rather than members. In end, having your own separate web page will make you seem more like your own independent entity. A lot of young academics I know have their own independent web pages:
epatters.org
Evan Patterson
www.epatters.orgMartin Escardo
in reply to John Carlos Baez • • •The same argument I gave to them. Originally they agreed and paused the discontinuing. But now IT services decide everything, regardless of impact on research visibility or student experience, or anything academic.
For people in the UK, discontinuing academic web pages is REF suicide.
Martin Escardo
in reply to Martin Escardo • • •In Computer Science at the University of Birmingham we are currently 3rd in REF in the UK.
I can see us easily going to 33rd after this move.
Conor Titania Mc Bride
in reply to Martin Escardo • • •Alexandra Lanes likes this.
Alexandra Lanes reshared this.
Leon P Smith
in reply to Conor Titania Mc Bride • • •@pigworker @johncarlosbaez
Honestly I remember one university who's main IT help desk was comically incompetent, and incredibly user hostile. For example, you could customize parts of your user experience on lab computers, but the settings would never stay.
The CS department handled their own IT at the time, and it was a _much_ more tolerable situation.
I've yet to understand why IT departments are typically so incredibly user-hostile, like they forget what purpose they actually serve.
Conor Titania Mc Bride
in reply to Leon P Smith • • •Conor Titania Mc Bride
in reply to Conor Titania Mc Bride • • •Leon P Smith
in reply to Conor Titania Mc Bride • • •@pigworker @johncarlosbaez
> I used to specialise in manufacturing specific needs. In fact, I still do.
Nice quote. That's certainly true of myself as well, to greater or lesser extent depending on whatever tends to capture my attention at that moment in time.
That's probably also why I found it pretty easy to get a bit crosswise with IT departments of all stripes.