Dear UK residents. I’m sorry to be tedious, but I’m going to do the trans Cassandra thing again.
The government is now moving towards regarding trans people as effective children until the age of 25.
This will be established as precedent and then used to screw over any and all young adults who can’t escape from abusive parents, especially young women.
If you want to do anything about this, you need to fight for trans people. Yes, you. Now.
We all know that isn’t going to happen to any significant extent though.
As you were.
like this
reshared this


Rachel Greenham
Unknown parent • • •Justiina Jumpsunen
Unknown parent • • •I would raise that age to 65. Need to live a little so that one can put it into perspective.
Jax UK
Unknown parent • • •Bore off you absolute giraffe.
Alexandra Lanes
Unknown parent • •Alexandra Lanes
in reply to Alexandra Lanes • •Seán Fenian
Unknown parent • • •Jinshei
Unknown parent • • •Jax UK
Unknown parent • • •Fuck off.
kæt
Unknown parent • • •@crocket2001
I think it's easy to underestimate how far most people have moved on this already. (Not that *most* makes it safe). There seem to be two groups pushing this:
1. boring folk who moan about the metric system, car parks, youth of today, ULEZ, "they're all as bad as each other", immigrants, etc.
2. Westminster-y policy type people, both left and right, professional dinner-party attenders, columnists, writers, wonks, essayists, student union types.
The (dangerous) difference now is that these groups -- our society's loudest, most boring, dull, dim, and reactionary, who only differ in social class -- are united on one subject.
The public don''t need to "come round".
People think Guardianista idealists lay out liberation's groundwork -- surveyors going ahead. But they're just apologists hanging on the coat-tails of emperors, minting excuses for comfortable lives at court. The powerful, their "clients", are moving right, so they're representing them, coining theories and writing reports.
Jinshei
in reply to Jinshei • • •