I had to sign up to a private dentist (no NHS in the area). One thing I always notice the few times I've had to go private for things is that you don't get lectured.
With the NHS it's like waiting for the NordVPN bit in a YouTube video, except you can't skip it.
You need to lose weight, stop drinking, eat better, exercise, wash behind your ears, phone your mother, come more often, not come as often, get more sleep, work less, just be happier, find some "me" time, stay informed but worry less, get out more, close the door (were you born in a barn?).
I wonder if there's been any papers on contrasting primary care providers who moan at their patients and those who don't. I can't help wondering if it's counterproductive.
It's made me much happier to book checkups knowing that we both start on the basis that I'm trying.
Dean Burnett (that brains guy)
Unknown parent • • •That's not my stance, in the slightest. But if you're going to make rigid rules that insist on individual's brains having the capability of a 'fully developed' one, then you can't ignore the fact that this development can be 'reversed' due to the consequences of age.
/19
Dean Burnett (that brains guy)
Unknown parent • • •Why? Well, if you're a species who likes familiarity and safety, you're at risk of stagnation. But if certain members of your population, particularly ones in their physical prime, tend to reject the norms and wander off to try new things, that'll stave off stagnation
/11
Dean Burnett (that brains guy)
Unknown parent • • •The risk-taking, emotive, exploratory, parent-rejecting tendencies of adolescents are seen in many social species, not just human. Unless it's the mother and father of all wild coincidences, this shows that teen brains are *meant* to do what they do.
/10
Dean Burnett (that brains guy)
Unknown parent • • •Thanks to basic entropy, if you're at retirement age, your brain will likely be losing fluid intelligence, the ability to reason, solve problems etc.
Can you trust such people to make important decisions? If you insist and a peak-performance brain, then technically no
/18
Dean Burnett (that brains guy)
Unknown parent • • •Teens in particular get a lot of stick for this. Their rebelliousness, they're highly-emotional nature, it's seen as proof they have something 'wrong' with their brains, because they're immature
The opposite is true. Their brains are doing exactly what they evolved to do
/9
Dean Burnett (that brains guy)
Unknown parent • • •Also, let's follow the logic to its conclusion
If having a brain functioning at its peak is a requirement of making important decisions, then it's probably more important to have a *maximum* age limit than a minimum. Because the older you are, the more your brain wears out
/17
Dean Burnett (that brains guy)
Unknown parent • • •There seems to be this idea that an 'underdeveloped' brain is like a half-built house: not fit for purpose until completed
In reality, it's more like evolution. Every step on the evolutionary ladder is a fully functioning species, they just change over time
/8
George Potter reshared this.
Dean Burnett (that brains guy)
Unknown parent • • •If under-25s are too neurologically underdeveloped to make decisions that affect their body and wellbeing, then that rules out all career athletes under that age. You can't possibly let a 18 year old take up a sport that comes with significant concussion risk, surely?
/16
Malin
in reply to Dean Burnett (that brains guy) • • •Once you're over 45 your brain's completely calcified.
It's basically just a lump of granite that replays songs from your teenage years while you still think of technology in terms of the poorly-scripted Sci-Fi TV you still own on DVD.
Definitely can't be trusted to vote on any new issues (i.e. 'any issues at all') once you lose all ability to develop beyond the thinking of the previous century.
Wayne Werner
Unknown parent • • •